July 13, 2009 at 4:18 P.M. Several attempts to update my security system were unsuccessful today. Hackers are obstructing access to my security system and may prevent updating or renewal of my system. 11 security risks were detected in my computer, so far, today. This usually means that essays will be vandalized or defaced to maximize frustration effects. I will do my best to make necessary corrections. I cannot say how many essays have been altered or damaged.
July 12, 2009 at 8:20 P.M. NJ/Florida hackers prevent me from updating my security system. This usually means that efforts are being made to insert new "errors" in my writings or to further damage my computer or otherwise obstruct my security system. I will try, overnight and in the morning, to update my system. I will continue to scan for security risks 24 hours per day.
July 12, 2009 at 8:10 P.M. After revising and correcting "errors" in "America's Holocaust" from 6:35 P.M. until 8:09 P.M. this evening, I was just prevented and obstructed in efforts to post the revised work. I will try, again, tomorrow to make the same revisions, then to post the corrected text. ("Fidel Castro's 'History Will Absolve Me'" and "American Hypocrisy and Luis Posada Carriles," finally, "Babalu and Free Speech Too.")
I believe that some of the people engaged in this sabotage effort are upset by my discussions of the Cuba issue; others are troubled by my opposition to mafia control of New Jersey. ("Law and Ethics in the Soprano State" and "Jaynee LaVecchia and Conduct Unbecoming to the Judiciary in New Jersey.")
July 8, 2009 at 1:28 P.M. This essay was posted earlier today. "Errors" have been inserted and corrected. I am saddened to report that we must expect more hacking, defacements, alterations of the text from protected cybercriminals in New Jersey, as Mr. Obama calls for human rights reforms in Russia. Let us push that "reset" button in New Jersey. It is alleged that the Jersey Boys had "something to do" with the Secretary of State's verbal mishap concerning a "reset" button in Russia. Watch your back, Madame Secretary. Nothing surprises me. ("Does Senator Menendez Have Mafia Friends?")
July 8, 2009 at 2:56 P.M. After making corrections approximately 45 minutes ago, I discovered new "errors" inserted in this essay as part of the continuing cybercrime directed against these writings from New Jersey government officials or their friends. (New Jersey's 'Ethical' Legal System.")
July 8, 2009 at 6:00 P.M. "Errors" inserted and corrected in my essay on the Oscars. Please see "Time to End the Embargo Against Cuba" and "Senator Bob, the Babe, and the Big Bucks."
My essay is based on the following sources:
Raymond Bonner, "Former Inmate Says Photos Show Abuse at Guantanamo," in The New York Times, July 7, 2009, at p. A9.
Scott Shane, "Cheney is Linked to Concealment of C.I.A. Project," in The New York Times, July 12, 2009, at p. A1. (Former Vice President Cheney instructed C.I.A. personnel to withhold information from Congress leading to possible deception of the people's representatives.)
Dan Frosch, "Court Upholds University's Dismissal of Professor Who Wrote 9/11 Essay," in The New York Times, July 8, 2009, at p. A15. (Censorship involving state action.)
Shaila Dewan, "State G.O.P. to Censure Governor Over Affair," in The New York Times, July 8, 2009, at p. A15. (GOP wants to get government off our backs, but still on our fronts.)
Rachel Donadio, "Pope Urges Forming New World Economic Order to Work for 'Common Good,'" in The New York Times, July 8, 2009, at p. A12. (Is the Pope a Communist?)
John Finnis, Natural Law, Natural Rights (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1980), pp. 134-156. (Christian Democratic Socialism.)
Salman Masood & Pir Zubair Shah, "Drone Said to Kill 16 Militants In Pakistan," in The New York Times, July 8, 2009, at p. A8. (One of dozens of "strikes" against Pakistani villages by U.S. robot bombs.)
William Glaberson, "Rulings of Improper Detentions In [Guantanamo] Cuba as the Bush Era Closes," in The New York Times, January 19, 2009, at p. A1. (Government held and tortured persons in Guantanamo "without good cause." However, the U.S. government is refusing to release many detainees because they are assumed to be, for some undisclosed reason, "the worst of the worst.")
John Schwartz, "Justice Dept. Whistle-Blower in Alabama Case Fired," in The New York Times, July 9, 2009, at p. A20. (Honest government employee who disclosed corruption fired as "unethical.")
Scott Shane, "Democrats Say the C.I.A. Deceived Congress for Years," in The New York Times, July 9, 2009, at p. A20. (Congress finds "weapons of mass deception.")
American society is perceived by the global community as trapped in an irreversible tailspin while falling to earth, like a faulty rocket. I continue to hope that this is not the case. I am struck by the contradictions characterizing American actions that do not seem to trouble our corporate and politically-coopted media. All of the stories discussed in this essay -- with one exception -- appeared over two days in America's "leading newspaper," which has been plagued by typos and bad grammar, incoherences, lapses in judgment, also poor editing for weeks and months. Nothing unusual, you say? ("Incoherence in the New York Times" and "'Revolutionary Road': A Movie Review," then "'The Reader': A Movie Review" and "What is it like to be plagiarized?")
American media silence may be balanced by attention in international and foreign media for some of my writings. This is very encouraging. I will persist in my efforts. ("What is it like to be tortured?" and "How Censorship Works in America.") American media silence is coordinated, allegedly, possibly from Washington, D.C. or Miami's "South Com." Of course, I do not believe such a possibility because American media is "free." We do not allow for censorship in this country. Nobody get fired or disbarred for expressing an opinion. (See above.)
What is going on in The New York Times? Is the editorial staff on drugs or are they leading a "parasitical life" while "doing nothing" to address readers' need for accurate information?
Considering that many of these posts are derived from facts reported in the Times, continuing silence on the part of a newspaper with many friends in the Democrat establishment is somewhat worrisome. I can only hope that no journalist at the Times would assist in censorship or suppressing free speech for a small fee. Maybe it is only for a large fee that they do such things. It is worth two dollars to purchase a newspaper that contains articles by Ginger Thompson and Manohla Dargis.
I may surprise you with what I am about to say: I urge you to read The New York Times, every day. If you have no access to the Times, then find the best newspaper in your area. Do not rely on television for your understanding of the world.
Surely no writer accepts money to attack another writer, surreptitiously, through insertions in his or her text with the knowledge of the "newspaper of record." What is "Atlas"? How many writers at the New York Times publish articles under pseudonyms? How many articles are written by committees and appear under a single "mythical" byline at the Times? Do politicians or intelligence agents insert comments in articles that appear in the Times? Are we in "denial" about the troubles in America's print media?
Perhaps it is time for an encounter session or intervention aimed at maximizing social adjustment. We MUST protect the integrity and independence of our best newspapers because many of our freedoms depend upon the good health of the press. ("How Censorship Works in America" and "Censorship and Cruelty in New Jersey.")
I ask you to remember -- if you are any kind of writer -- that my free speech rights are your free speech rights. This is true regardless of what you think of me or my opinions. Where is America's PEN Center? Not sexy enough to take on the mafia's political friends in New Jersey? Intimidated? ("Jay Romano and Conduct Unbecoming to the Judiciary in New Jersey" and "Jaynee LaVecchia and Conduct Unbecoming to the Judiciary in New Jersey" as well as "Does Senator Menendez Have Mafia Friends?")
"A former inmate of the prison camp at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, who was released to Britain this year, has asked a federal court in Washington to preserve 'photographic evidence' that he says shows him being 'savagely beaten' while a detainee."
I believe this man's version of events. This narrative confirms the stories of many other survivors of America's concentration camps. In the event that the slander machine has been cranked up by New Jersey, I should note that I have never been accused of a crime nor did I steal money from clients. Theft is something reserved for politicians in New Jersey, when they are not sexually molesting children. ("New Jersey is the Home of the Living Dead" and "Neil M. Cohen, Esq. and Conduct Unbecoming to the Legislature in New Jersey.")
Mr. Rabner and Ms. Milgram, I am renewing my request for all video- and audiotapes of interrogations or so-called "therapy" sessions, together with all reports or records of any kind of all "interviews" of me, or interviews of others pertaining to me -- including interviews conducted secretly, at any location, by any alleged "therapist" and/or others on behalf of, or with the knowledge of New Jersey's government in any form or fashion from 1988 to 2009. ("What is it like to be tortured?" and "Terry Tuchin, Diana Lisa Riccioli, and New Jersey's Agency of Torture.")
Mr. Rabner and Ms. Milgram, I am requesting the names of all persons present at all so-called "sessions" where I was a subject of interrogation, or when persons relevant to matters concerning me were questioned under hypnosis or in an otherwise impaired state, especially against their will or without their knowledge and/or consent. I am requesting any "deleted" items, hidden documents, including records of any payments made to any persons for testimony against me, or for any other reasons involving litigation against me, or in cooperation with or concerning interrogation sessions aimed against me, including all records of fees paid to Terry Tuchin and/or Diana Lisa Riccioli during the period from 1988 to 2009 by any state entity, whether secretly or not, for any reason whatsoever. I am asking for all discovery withheld from me, illegally and unconstitutionally, by the OAE, AG, or any other state entity. I am specifically requesting records of all Internet monitoring involving any computer in my home by anyone on behalf of any entity of any kind affiliated in any way with New Jersey government and courts.
Any payments made to persons to participate in on-line discussions or to contact me from 1988 to 2009 are also requested. The names of persons asked to participate in such on-line discussions with me or contacts, whether for payment or freely, are also requested. Mark Leyner? The Philosophy Cafe? OAE? ("Censorship and Cruelty in New Jersey" and "What is it like to be plagiarized?") Were any of the participants in The Philosophy Cafe affiliated in any way with the OAE? NJ Bar Association? NJ Municipalities? Police?
"In an affidavit filed in June with United States District Court, the former inmate, Binyam Mohammed, said that video and still cameras had documented his abuse, and that he had seen some of the images, which he said were in the possession of his lawyers."
"He said in an affidavit that in May 2006 a guard 'slammed my head down on the concrete floor,' and another 'grabbed my testicles and punched me.' ..."
"Later 'another guard slammed me and my Koran into the fence,' Mr. Mohammed said. He said soldiers had 'strapped him down and shaved half his beard, and they then performed a humiliating anal cavity search,' although it was patently obvious that there was nothing to find."
I urge readers to see the short play that I have posted entitled: "Morality Play."
"Under the rules for lawyers representing Guantanamo detainees, Mr. Stafford Smith said, the government has ordered [Mohammed's lawyer] to DESTROY the photographic evidence now that Mr. Mohammed has been freed. It added that it had made similar requests in other cases of released detainees." (emphasis added!)
The U.S. government is asking a lawyer to destroy the very of evidence of criminal conduct by government officials which his former client is now seeking. This act could make the lawyer liable for obstruction of justice and also as an accessory to a criminal conspiracy to violate his own client's civil rights. Invasion of fiduciary relations -- including attorney-client relations -- is an essential ingredient of totalitarianism. Right, Terry A. Tuchin?
If the lawyer refuses to comply with this instruction, then he may be disbarred for a breach of ethics rules requiring compliance on the part of members of the bar with all rules and regulations of a tribunal. If the lawyer complies with this request, he will probably be indicted (eventually) and may be sent to prison, for which a lawyer may also be disbarred.
This is a schizoid reaction on the part of the U.S. government: 1) to appear more moral and legalistic than the rest of the planet by pretending to an absurd and false public morality (hence, the pretense at outrage at the affair of a married politician); while 2) committing Nazi-like atrocities at concentration camps, hiding the truth in the form of photos and other evidence of beatings, rape, theft, assaults, and hideous New Jersey-like medical experiments as well as a murder or two with regard to mostly innocent and falsely held as well as untried persons. Many of these persons are Muslims and/or minority group members. We must abide, again, by the principles of a Constitution of which we are justly proud. ("American Doctors and Torture" and "Psychological Torture in the American Legal System.")
Government (mostly lawyers) in America continues to be charged with lying or perjury, cover-ups, theft of public funds in the billions of dollars (as in New Jersey), as well as the most corrupt and sold out judiciary in the world, also in places like New Jersey. ("U.S. Lawyers Escape Prosecution for Torture.")
This contradiction between our public posture and realities on the ground results in puzzled stares from political leaders in other countries when U.S. officials visit and offer a list of practices deemed to "violate human rights." We are not in a position to comment on the human rights violations of other countries because we have forgotten our own fundamental commitments with regard to human rights issues. New Jersey's sad spectacle is an omen of things to come.
Secretary of State Clinton and President Obama, Vice President Biden and a few others are trying to do what they can to reverse years of disdain for international law, world opinion, human rights of persons under U.S. jurisdiction as they cope with an economy gutted by the previous administration while we bleed money and lives in Iraq, Afghanistan, and soon in Pakistan, if we are not careful.
New Jersey similarly disdains the U.S. Constitution and civil rights of its many victims by refusing to comply with legally required obligations of decency and integrity in legal proceedings, "open file" policies and sunshine laws, as Garden State politicians continue to steal taxpayer money. ("Law and Ethics in the Soprano State" and "New Jersey Finally Prohibits Hypnosis in Interrogation.")
Ms. Milgram, should you not tell the truth to New Jersey's victims of psychological torture at the hands of persons like Terry Tuchin and Diana Lisa Riccioli? "Lesbian loyalties" nothwithstanding?
Amazingly, the U.S. federal government cannot control the criminality of New Jersey's power-structure. However, we presume to dictate the behavior of other national governments. When confronted with crimes and cover-ups, New Jersey's Democrat power-structure responds: "All politics is local. We do whatever we want. Business as usual."
This attitude may explain the arrests for bank fraud yesterday in New Jersey. Bank fraud is reserved for the Democrat machine in Trenton, not for civilians. Theft in the millions has been uncovered, yet again, in the vicinity of New Jersey's cranberry fields and raw sewage dump sites, which are usually the same territories. Connections between arrested persons and prominent political figures have yet to be explored. Senator Bob? How are the twins doing, I wonder? Garcia? How's the development deal in Bayonne, Bob? Did they find "chromium" and other buried chemical waste at the location where taxpayer investment was sought by N.J.'s junior Senator? Would it be considered criminal fraud for a seller to remain silent about known chemical hazards in property that is to be sold to the U.S. taxpayers as investors? ("More Problems for Menendez -- Tapes!")
"Two missiles fired from a remotely piloted American aircraft struck a militant base on Tuesday in the South Waziristan tribal region, killing 16 militants" -- some of these "militants" are probably 9 years-old! -- "according to intelligence officials and residents reached by telephone."
Any alleged "resident" that the journalist could reach by telephone is an intelligence agent or a member of the Taliban. "Collateral damage" has resulted in the deaths of hundreds of civilians that blame the U.S. for these attacks. We are creating our own opposition in Pakistan. Pakistan is a nuclear power in danger of falling to Taliban forces. Iraq will be a picnic compared to a war in Pakistan, which is right on China's and India's borders. There are people in the opposition party discussing military action against North Korea, which has a million person army. We are not fighting enough wars right now, they say, we need another one. Wars are always good for business.
Two letters deleted (so far) and more protected cybercrime is on the way. Oh, boy!
The Pakistani government is unpopular with its own people because of cooperating with the U.S. America has made many military officials in Pakistan wealthy, mysteriously, even as the people are suffering and increasingly forced into exile. These drone weapons are creating "collateral damage" in the millions of dollars while leading survivors to join revolutionary forces under the dreadful Taliban leadership. Ossama bin Laden could not ask for a better scenario.
"At least the Taliban look you in the eye when they shoot you."
I am sure that this sort of comment will be heard, often, in Waziristan -- as it is in New Jersey.
More letters may be deleted or other "errors" inserted at any time in the land that symbolizes "freedom of expression" under the Constitution by which we claim to live our lives which prohibits censorship as well as all suppressions of political speech. I wish to be as clear as possible for the benefit of New Jersey persons: "Prohibit" means that you must not censor the speech of others by misusing government power. This must remain true even in New Jersey's chemical dump sites and odorous as well as odious courtrooms. Do you speak to me of ethics and legality, Anne Milgram, Esq.? ("What is it like to be tortured?")
"Opposition politicians, on the other hand, vociferously oppose [sic.] drone strikes and see them as a major cause of public disatisfaction." [sic.] The New York Times?!
The Pope's recent encyclical on economic matters, written in Latin, is a page-turner. Skyrocketing to the top of the New York Times best-seller list is unlikely. However, the Pope's concern with greed and economic injustice under globalization is more timely and urgent than ever, despite being a moral tract, than excessive worrying about the sex lives of U.S. public officials.
The Vatican has condemned torture -- including the torture of detainees in Abu Ghraib and Guantanamo -- as inhumane and barbaric. The same may be said for "cruel embargos" that deprive children of food and old persons of medicine. I am quoting from memory the speech of Fidel Castro at the United Nations. ("Fidel Castro's 'History Will Absolve Me'" and "'Che': A Movie Review.")
I trust that these mild remarks will be sufficient for Cubanazos to accuse me of Communism and threaten to "assassinate" me as one more example "collateral damage" in their war against Marxism in all its forms. Perhaps Pope Benedict XVI is a Communist. ("American Hypocrisy and Luis Posada Carriles" and "Babalu and Free Speech Too!") Will New Jersey's Cubanoids seek to assassinate the Pope?
I have decided to respond to recent censorship and defacement efforts by focusing more on the achievements of the Cuban Revolution in reviews of Cuban films. I will be sure to send copies of these essays to Cuban-American politicians. I will also express my criticisms of the Cuban Revolution and my reservations about American foreign policy.
"Three months after a jury ruled that Ward L. Churchill, a former University of Colorado professor, was wrongfully terminated for his political views, a judge on Tuesday refused to give him his job back."
"Cubanoids" in Coral Gables -- who are much concerned about "freedom" -- do not protest the denial of free speech to this American dissident intellectual. I wonder why? Where is the outrage at the Miami Herald?
Some token arguments from the university concerning academic merits notwithstanding, this termination (perhaps Mr. Churchill will be found "unethical"?) is a direct result of his cogent and scholarly criticisms of American foreign policy. I am sure that this professor was fired because he "spoke truth to power." (Malcolm X)
"What is really a shame here is that a jury said Ward Churchill's free speech was violated, and yet Judge Naves goes on for almost 50 pages, saying in so many words, 'Too bad.' ..."
The U.S. has expressed concerns about rights of free speech in Cuba, China, Russia and elsewhere. The response to the daily violations of free speech rights by American officials taking place before your eyes is apathy. Too bad.
