January 20, 2008 at 11:51 A.M. new "errors" inserted and corrected.
January 2, 2008 at 8:53 P.M. hackers have damaged the security system again. I cannot update my system. As a result I may not be protected against the latest viruses.
January 2, 2008 at 11:54 A.M. I awoke this morning to find that my security system had been disconnected overnight. I cannot say how many essays have been vandalized. I will do my best to make corrections. Attempts to print items from my MSN group leave me with a blank page bearing the following information on the upper left corner: "SRCH_SearchGames_Crosswire_052007_728x90" and at the bottom of the page is this address:
http://view.atdmt.com/iview/msnnkhac001728x90xWBCBRB00110msn/direct;wi.728;hi.90/01
December 31, 2007 at 10:55 P.M. new "errors" inserted and corrected.
December 30, 2007 at 5:45 P.M. calls from 323-871-0684; December 31, 2007 at 11:43 A.M. calls from 231-732-2413.
December 31, 2007 at 11:36 A.M. I am unable to access my MSN group because of obstructions. I am blocking:
http://m1.2mdn.net/viewad/11410110/7-1x1.gif (illegal tracking?)
http://ad.doubleclick.net/ad/N3880.SD2527.3880/... (N.J. spyware-hacking?)
December 22, 2007 at 11:10 A.M. new "errors" were inserted in an essay on Shakespeare's Hamlet at my msn group. I cannot print from my group. I will run new scans and continue to struggle. For years I have struggled against hundreds of illegal intrusions, vandalism, defacements, alterations and other criminal censorship activities against copyrighted material emanating from N.J. government computers, I believe, at the orders of officials sworn to uphold the law. I will continue to struggle.
December 24, 2007 at 11:39 A.M. a brief interruption of my cable signal. I am blocking: http://ad.doubleclick.net/adj/N3880.sd2527.3880...
It is possible that, at any time, I will be prevented from continuing to write or that my computer will be disabled by hackers. If this occurs -- if I am silenced -- you can be sure that it will not be voluntary. I will continue to write somehow, from some computer. December 30, 2007 at 4:37 P.M.
No images can be posted at this blog or at my profile. I cannot access my own books on-line. I have no way of knowing whether they are still available.
David Kociniewski, "In Witness Killing, Prosecutors Point to a Gang and a Lawyer," in The New York Times, December 21, 2007, at p. A1.
Jeremy Peters, "Prosecutor Asks to be Removed From Trooper Sex Assault Case," in The New York Times, December 21, 2007, at p. B8.
"[Federal] prosecutors believe that a [N.J.] defense lawyer" -- who ran a brothel in Manhattan on the side, allegedly -- "played a role in facilitating the murder of a witness." (See "One of New Jersey's Highly Ethical Attorneys Has a Problem.")
New Jersey prosecutors are said to resent complying with due process requirements of the U.S. and state constitutions along with so-called "open file" policies. Some government lawyers even violate the law and obstruct justice (which is criminal) by withholding exculpatory evidence and material, together with the names of witnesses helpful to a litigant in civil proceedings as well as criminal cases. I doubt whether such a thing is "ethical." I also have a reservation or two about government lawyers participating in (or being present during) the torture of litigants in civil litigation to extract information, unconstitutionally, that is to be used against those litigants in further legal proceedings.
What do you think, John? What does your rule book say? N.J. government lawyers may even solicit grievances against a politically targeted attorney in ethics proceedings, then they "evaluate" those grievances. Are "grievants "paid off"? Ethics? No penalties are imposed on such criminal government lawyers, allegedly. I wonder how many defense lawyers are targeted, secretly, in this awful and very political way? Are N.J. "judicial" persons involved in a criminal conspiracy to violate civil rights, damaging my writings on a daily basis? Is such participation in criminal conspiracies by judges or prosecutors from Union or Hudson Counties "ethical"? Censorship against me, suppression of my writings, is also a criminal denial of your Constitutionally protected rights of access to controversial material. How do you feel about that?
These crimes and many others are not deemed to be "unethical," right Terry, not in New Jersey? Are you "ethical" Terry? "Irreconcilable conflict" between therapeutic and forensic roles means that questioning persons under hypnosis -- in a desperate effort to get something on them or their friends -- is a big no-no for any so-called therapist or attorney. For any attorney to witness or participate in such questioning-torture is a heinous crime. How do you live with your hypocrisy? How do you have the nerve to judge me? Are you still a Jew, Terry? Who do you think will be next, Terry, if such tactics become widespread?
Mr. Bergrin will not face professional or ethics charges in New Jersey, according to today's Times. Bergrin is seen as highly "ethical" in Trenton. Perhaps this good opinion of Bergrin has something to do with Bergrin's alleged supplying of sexual favors to officials in the Garden State, including Stuart Rabner perhaps?
Walking out of a brothel with $5,000 in cash every week (money taken from sex workers), after they were pressured, allegedly, to supply sexual favors for New Jersey bosses -- that's all hunky-dory. Belated filing of ethics charges will not mitigate the moral blindness revealed by the Bergrin case. How much did you steal from my office, Diana? (See "One of New Jersey's Highly Ethical Attorneys Has a Problem" and "Jaynee La Vechia and Conduct Unbecoming to the Judiciary in New Jersey.")
Prosecutors are afraid of the New Jersey State Police and mob (often the same people, evidently) and do not wish to pursue the rape investigation against troopers. Hence, the removal of the rape investigation from the Mercer County Prosecutor's Office, after highly questionable statements -- clearly aimed at getting rid of this case by that office -- came to light. New Jersey prosecutors need the cooperation of cops and are often afraid of them. Accordingly, laws and even the highest law of the land, the Constitution, gets set aside in New Jersey. What the hell. Mob rule. (See "New Jersey's Feces-Covered Supreme Court" and "What is it like to be tortured?")
People in the system fear retaliation from rogue cops and dirty units in the various forces, like the Lords of Discipline or the OAE. The result is mob-cop cooperation which (I was told) is a fact of life in New Jersey. Not for me. Not when someone I love gets hurt. Not when I get hurt. (See "New Jersey's KKK Police Shocker!")
How do you call yourselves lawyers and judges while wallowing in this moral cesspool? You really think that you're better than the rest of us? It should sicken all of us to see that this is what an American jurisdiction has become? The entire New Jersey legal system is a whore house run by people like Mr. Bergrin, sometimes much worse people. "Let's get tough on crime!" Senator Bob said. (See "Senator Bob, the Babe, and the Big Bucks," "U.S. Attorney Christopher J. Christie Says -- You Ain't Seen Nothing Yet!" and "The U.S. Attorney and the Jersey Boys.")
New Jersey's legal and political corruption is a "disease" in the words of U.S. Attorney, Christopher J. Christie. I fear that the plague is spreading from New Jersey -- like a miasmic cloud of corruption -- and invading other jurisdictions. "Errors" have been inserted in a number of my writings today. I will make corrections as quickly as possible. This level of corruption and incompetence in courts and public institutions threatens national security. (See "We don't know from nothing.")
"'The defendants have a right to know the evidence against them,' said Assemblywoman Bonnie Watson Coleman ..."
They also have a right to confrontation. Right, Terry? This is even more true in civil proceedings. These are matters in which there is no risk to witnesses. Furthermore, the authorities know that. To participate in criminal withholding of exculpatory material, to lie or conceal it for years, then to have the nerve to speak to a crime victim of his so-called "ethics" violations makes the very word "ethics" (in New Jersey) a horrible lie. Sadly, it appears that even the New Jersey Supreme Court must now be described as a "Confederacy of Dunces" or (far worse) a gathering of legal whores -- cheap whores.
Does this offend you? Does it insult you? This is a dozen roses compared to what has been said of me and persons I love by New Jersey's ethics "officials" or their agents, secretly, and with immunity. "We'll just pretend that nothing happened!" Is that right, Terry? How many others have you tortured under hypnosis, Terry and Diana? "Apparent authority" to act for the A.G.? OAE? DRB?
If the concern is to protect witnesses, which I doubt -- since witnesses cease to interest prosecutors once trials are over -- recall that only defendants are entitled to the information and no one else. Reminders to defendants that any "mishap" occurring to a witness will result in additional charges against that defendant, accompanied by suggestions to defense counsel that "sharing" such information with the public guarantees disbarment, will substantially reduce the risks for witnesses. Defense counsel interested in a life of crime should either enter politics or become judges in New Jersey, also applications for positions with the OAE are now being accepted. I understand that there will be a few or MANY vacancies soon.
New Jersey's Star Chamber-like proceedings, governmentality outside of law, violations of individual rights, torture, rape and cover ups are activities worthy of Stalin's Soviet Union, not the United States of America. This is true even if the victim's mother wears combat boots. I will deal with the ad hominem bullshit in my final paragraphs. Government must respect individual privacy, free speech and autonomy, human dignity and the full panoply of Constitutional protections of fundamental rights. Government is not entrusted with making normal people morally "better" (by whose standard?) or "enhancing normalization and social adjustment." Law Professor Robert P. George writes:
"Government must not run people's lives or usurp the roles and responsibilities of families, religious bodies, and other character- and culture-forming authoritative communities." First Things, January, 2008, at p. 23. (See "Deborah T. Poritz and Conduct Unbecoming to the Judiciary in New Jersey.")
Everybody seems very interested in bigamy and marriage issues these days. The state is concerned only with those unions for which parties seek a legal sanction. You get a piece of paper that certifies a union as a "marriage" only once (not at all, if you're gay in most or all states), until divorce. How many persons you love, or the loving relationships in which you are involved, or what you choose to call your relationships among yourselves is your business, so is how you define "family" -- "family" means "loving relationships," as far as I am concerned. I say this as someone who has CHOSEN to sleep with only one person, a woman, for the past nineteen years or so. (See "Steven Schaeffer and Conduct Unbecoming to the Judiciary in New Jersey.")
How I love any person -- or that person's role in my life -- is my business, not ANY government's business. Happy Holidays, boys and girls!
