December 9, 2009 at 3:19 P.M. An advertisement was imposed on these blogs: "Save $ Inmate Phone Calls, Immediate Savings on Inmate Calls (888) 728-2726 to save big today! http://www.conscallhome.com/ "
The plight of inmates is very amusing to some people in New Jersey government. ("An Unpleasant Encounter With New Jersey's State Police" and "N.J.'s KKK Police Shocker!")
September 26, 2009 at 1:33 P.M. A number of cyberattacks prevent me from accessing my Yahoo account. I will struggle to continue writing from public computers.
Andrew Sullivan, "Dear Mr. Bush, You Approved Torture -- Only You Can Fix the Damage," in The Atlantic, October, 2009, at p. 78. (Time to get off the pot, Mr. Rabner.)
Philippe Sands, "Torture -- The Complicit General," in The New York Review of Books, September 24, 2009, at p. 20. (Further evidence of U.S. psychological torture policies, many are used against inmates in US prisons.)
William K. Rashbaum & Al Baker, "Police Official In Terror Unit is Removed," in The New York Times, September 24, 2009, at p. A1. (You decide. Working for the Jersey Boys?)
Peter Baker, "Obama Says Current Law Will Support Detentions," in The New York Times, September 24, 2009, at p. A23. (Disappointing.)
David M. Halfbinger & David Kocieniewski, "For Christie, A Family Tie No Candidate Can Relish," in The New York Times, September 24, 2009, at p. A30. (Luca Brazzi says hello!)
"Prisoners' Rights," (Editorial) in The New York Times, September 24, 2009, at p. A40. (What have we become?)
Peter Baker & David Johnson, "Guantanamo Deadline May be Missed," in The New York Times, September 29, 2009, at p. A27. (There is a fear, internationally, that Mr. Obama is neutralized by intelligence services and Republican enemies ignoring the chain of command.)
David Cole, "The Case Against the Torture Memo Lawyers," in The New York Review of Books, October 8, 2009, at p. 14. (American lawyers responsible for "crimes against humanity" and Holocaust-like evil" are rewarded with federal Circuit Court or N.J. judgeships.)
New Jersey lawyers and "minions" may deface or alter these essays on a daily basis. I have spent forty minutes or so correcting "errors" inserted in writings describing torture. This is considered an adequate response to charges of atrocity on the part of OAE officials and their agents. September 30, 2009 at 10:06 A.M.
More sex lives of New Jersey judges will be discussed at length in forthcoming essays.
"In 1996, Congress passed a law that made it much harder for inmates to challenge abusive treatment. It has contributed significantly to the bad conditions -- including the desperate overcrowding -- that prevail today. The law must be fixed."
The situation of many inmates -- this is especially true of women who are incarcerated -- can only be likened to slavery. Worse, there is a sexual form of abuse, especially for young offenders, that is gruesome and destructive of whatever semblance of humanity remains for women (particularly) who are imprisoned in the dungeons of America. ("Foucault, Rose, Davis and the Meanings of Prison.")
American women inmates are, overwhelmingly, victims of exploitation, child abuse, drug addiction, and other social ills long before they get to prison, usually in childhood. The trauma of imprisonment, when combined with these tortures, makes them worse offenders and more dangerously ill women. Much the same is true of men who are incarcerated. The obstacles and injustices are almost always worse for women than men.
Prison administration attracts an unusual number of individuals, male and female, who are sadists, officials relishing the sanctioned opportunity to indulge in vicious cruelties as well as sexual violations. Traditionally, the only real remedy for PERSONS who are incarcerated and subject to the desires of sadists in uniforms of various kinds has been access to the courts. Internal mechanisms or administrative hearings are a joke in prisons.
Psychobabblers and other social workers are "enablers" of abuse -- or abusers themselves -- in many instances. These social scientists see prisoners as fodder for experiments and sources for exploitation in their projects and careers. They are usually detested by inmates, deservedly and appropriately detested. I often agree with inmates about such so-called "whores of the court." ("Terry Tuchin, Diana Lisa Riccioli, and New Jersey's Agency of Torture.")
"In the name of clamping down on frivolous lawsuits, the Prison Reform Litigation Act barred prisoners from suing prisons and jails unless they could show that they had suffered a physical injury. Prison officials have used this requirement to block lawsuits challenging all sorts of horrific conditions, including sexual abuse." (emphasis added)
Most women are constrained, already, from reporting the sexual abuse to which they are often subjected in American prisons -- sometimes every day -- by fears of retribution (from guards) or the power-structure within prisons (other inmates), a power-structure which may be complicit with rituals of sexual domination or the desires of the administration of a facility. A prison sentence for many American women is mandatory consignment to a course of sexual abuse and exploitation which is, in nearly every instance, exactly what has brought these women to prison in the first place. We are guaranteeing young offenders a life of crime and return visits to prison. (Again: "Foucault, Rose, Davis and the Meanings of Prison.")
There is enough tragedy and suffering, also injustice and abuse of power, sadism and relish of cruelty in women's penal institutions to last a lifetime for an observer who spends only one day visiting and talking to imprisoned women.
"The law also requires inmates to present their claims to prison officials before filing a suit. The prisons set the rules for those grievance procedures, notes Stephen Bright, the president of the Southern Center for Human Rights, and they have an incentive to make the rules as complicated as possible, so prisoners will not be able to sue. 'That has become the main purpose of many grievance systems,' Mr. Bright told Congress last year."
Women inmates do not have multimillion dollar lobbyists in Congress and, often, are not represented by able counsel before the U.S. Supreme Court. They are easy targets of politically popular, but meaningless non-solutions to crime and incarceration controversies:
"In the last Congress, Representative Robert Scott, Democrat of Virginia, sponsored the Prison Abuse Remedies Act. It would have made it harder for prison officials to get suits dismissed for failure to exhaust grievance procedures. It would have exempted juveniles, who are especially vulnerable to abuse, from the law's restrictions."
One "error" inserted since this morning has now been corrected. I am shocked to learn that some Right-wing Cubans object to literacy programs in Cuban schools, while opposing racial integration in American schools in Miami. ("Babalu and Free Speech Too!" and "American Hypocrisy and Luis Posada Carriles.")
"The bill's supporters need to try again this year. Conditions in the nation's overcrowded prisons are becoming increasingly dangerous: recently, there have been major riots in California and Kentucky. Prisoner lawsuits are a way of reining in the worst abuses, which contribute to prison riots and other violence."
"The main reason to pass the new law, though, is human decency. [We don't believe in human decency any more.] The only way to ensure that inmates are not mistreated is to guarantee them a fair opportunity to bring their legitimate complaints to court."
Among the scandals in prison administration is the negligent or incompetent medical care afforded to inmates that is Tuchin-like in its disdain for the welfare of victims of abuse and mistreatment. Women are raped in prison every day. Many do not receive treatment for illnesses until it is too late to do much good. ("Would you have helped Kitty Genovese?")
" ... In concluding that it does not need specific permission from Congress to hold detainees without charges" -- not without convictions, but without CHARGES! -- "the Obama administration is adopting one of the arguments advanced by the Bush administration in years of debates about detention policies."
America's first African-American president cannot be soft on slavery. Mr. Obama said: "We will not abandon Constitutional principles for expediency." Well, our most fundamental commitment in a free society is to due process of law. No deprivation of liberty without charges and conviction. No PERSON will be deprived of "life, liberty or property" without due process of law. 1988-2009? (Thomas Jefferson, James Madison) There will be "no torture" in this Republic. There will be no censorship in the United States of America. (Chief Justice John Marshall) Are Jefferson, Madison, Marshall "Communists"? Are the Framers of the Constitution "soft on terrorism"?
Mr. Obama's continuation of Bush/Cheney inhumanity -- if true! -- is not in keeping with our values nor with your own campaign speeches, Mr. President. One new "error" inserted and corrected in the ongoing cyberwars. There is more at stake than your political advantage from not being perceived as "soft on terrorism." I know that this matter has not yet received the administration's full attention or final decision. I am sure that discussions of this policy will be as intense as the criticisms of continuation of Bush practices deserve to be. The United States of America must not plunge to the latrine-like levels of its worst jurisdictions, such as New Jersey. We must abide by a higher standard on the world stage. Any more "errors" that you OAE lawyers wish to insert in this essay?
A third "error" has been inserted and corrected. ("What is it like to be plagiarized?" and "What is it like to be tortured?")
What is at stake in this debate is America's Constitutional commitment and conscience. This "going along to get along" is not acceptable, Mr. Obama, even if it is tempting and easy for you politically. You know this much already. Please reconsider your decision on this issue.
Chris Christie's uncle was a member of organized crime. Nearly every prominent person in New Jersey politics and law has family members in organized crime. In fact, New Jersey's politics and law have become organized crime, a family affair. Right, Diana? This may help to explain the humiliating inability of law enforcement to control the spectacle to which you are a witness, every day. Judges, politicians, lawyers relieve themselves on the Bill of Rights before your eyes. Right, Howard?
September 30, 2009 at 10:17 A.M. I have just corrected newly inserted "errors" in "Terry Tuchin, Diana Lisa Riccioli, and New Jersey's Agency of Torture." I expect these "errors" to be restored to the text by hackers from Trenton, New Jersey. ("Debbie Poritz Likes the Ladies!" and "Sybil R. Moses and Conduct Unbecoming to the Judiciary in New Jersey.")
The allegations in the media that Mr. Christie concentrated on political corruption in New Jersey, as opposed to organized crime, neglects the fact that mafia activity (which is much more than Italian in the Garden State) is focused on political corruption. Political corruption is organized crime in New Jersey. Right, Alex Booth?
Christie is a corruption fighter and opponent of the way business has been done in New Jersey for decades. Residents of the state need a governor like Chris Christie, regardless of party affiliation. If you wish to continue to be robbed blind by the various mafia families from Trenton vote for the Democrat machine (all of the registered voters in the cemetery will do so). Otherwise, please try to rescue what is left of New Jersey government and the courts by getting an honest politician into office who will not accept a bribe from the mob. ("New Jersey is the Home of the Living Dead" and "Is New Jersey Lucky Luciano's Havana?")
I am struggling to remind politicians and judges in New Jersey that they once had a conscience. True, many of them never had a conscience. The situation concerning the tortures that I have described in these essays along with my experiences with fraudulent proceedings in the state's legal system are making their way through the Internet to some distant places. This nightmare is becoming global. I will not be intimidated. There is no member of the bar in the Garden State that I have met who is in a position to argue these philosophical-jurisprudential issues with me. Cybercrime is not the answer. Censorship is not the answer. Inserting "errors" in my writings is not the answer. The real number of hits at this blog may be from 25,000-50,000; my book is circulating pretty widely in the world; and there is more interest expressed in my ideas and opinions every day. You cannot beat up ideas. You are witnesses to American jurisdiction defecating on the U.S. Constitution. Give me those reports, Mr. Rabner.
New Jersey has become a byword for human rights violations, corrupt legal proceedings, sold out judges, incompetent government and decades-old cover-ups. There must be one or two people left in New Jersey's judiciary with some semblance of decency or humanity who appreciate what is at stake in this matter. Have you no shame, Mr. Rabner?
"The point of this letter, [President Bush,] is to beg you to finally take responsibility for this stain on American honor and this burden on a war we must win. It is to plead with you to own what happened under your command, and to reject categorically the phony legalisms, criminal destruction of crucial evidence, and retrospective rationalizations used to pretend that none of this happened. It happened. You once said, 'I'm worried about a culture that says ... If you've got a problem -- blame somebody else.' I'm asking you to stop blaming others for the consequences of decisions you made."
The buck stops with you, Mr. Rabner and Ms. Milgram. The legal system of New Jersey is a disgrace to the United States of America, a daily DEFECATION on legality, where sanctioned public theft -- also mafia involvement in the judiciary and higher echelons of the legal profession -- coincides with grotesque and unprecedented levels of incompetence that are not matched in any First World legal system.
A fourth "error" was inserted in this essay since this morning. I have now corrected that "error."
Mr. Rabner, put an end to the cover-ups, lies, obstructions, malingering, pointless delays, turn over Tuchin's and Riccioli's reports and records, today, along with all videotapes and audiotapes (including items hidden by the OAE), in order to make amends for these terrible crimes while compensating -- to the extent that you can do so -- for the thefts and other atrocities committed against me and others. Maybe there is still time for you to clean the judicial robes that you have sullied, thus removing the stench that hovers over your tainted courtrooms and legal chambers (as well as yourself) in New Jersey.
How many others in New Jersey will never know that their rights were violated when they were subjected to secret hypnosis sessions by so-called "therapists," like Terry Tuchin of Ridgewood, New Jersey?
Why not abide by the Constitution that you, Mr. Rabner, once promised to enforce?
