December 12, 2007 at 2:36 P.M. phone calls from 678-253-0251 (1:13 P.M.) and 402-727-2510 (11:30 A.M.).
December 6, 2007 at 11:50 A.M. my cable signal was blocked, illegally, again.
December 3, 2007 at 12:21 P.M. I have just regained access to the Internet, after my signal was blocked since about 8:00 A.M. More calls from 352-357-4151.
I am unable to change the image in my profile today. I will keep trying. The updating feature of my security system is still disabled. Given the destruction or disabling of my image-posting feature in my profile, I do not know whether I will be able to provide an image for my profile again. Is this destruction of my "image" at blogger a tacit threat?
I deny -- and I am prepared to do so under oath -- that I am a lawyer. Anyone who calls me a N.J. lawyer is slandering me, viciously. Anyone who identifies me as a N.J. lawyer (or worse, a N.J. "judge," a title claimed, surreptitiously, by some at the OAE who solicit grievances then LIE about it!) is publishing "fighting words." Today's image would have been:
http://www.chinadaily.com.cn/entertainment/2006-12/01/xin_021203011521694148115.jpg
November 30, 2007 at 11:39 A.M. phone calls received from 303-395-2345. I am blocking:
http://view.atdmt.com/iview/msnnkhac001728x90xWBCBRB00110msn/direct;wi.728;hi.90/01
"Newark: Claim of Improper Questioning," The New York Times, November 27, 2007, at p. B6.
"The New Jersey attorney general [Anne Milgram] said yesterday that a city police official acted improperly by asking about the immigration status of two journalists who witnessed a crime scene in September, violating a state directive on immigrants, and law enforcement. The journalists, a freelance photographer and the editor of the Brazilian Voice [sic.] newspaper, reported to the police that the photographer had found a woman's body in a Newark alley. They were questioned about their immigration status by the official, Deputy Chief Samuel A. DeMaio, the attorney general's office said. The directive, introduced in August, [by Ms. Milgram,] tells the police to ask the immigration status only of those arrested on indictable offenses or for drunken driving. In a statement, Attorney General Anne Milgram ... said the directive 'specifically prohibits police from inquiring about the immigration status of any victim, witness or person requesting police assistance.' The Newark police director, Garry F. McCarthy, said the Police Department would review the matter before deciding whether to reprimand Chief DeMaio."
Ms. Milgram's idiotic directive was greeted with derision and prophecies that such errors would be committed often and, sometimes, deliberately. Those prophecies and predictions have now come true. The result of this moronic directive to police officers -- in the absence of further evidence, it appears that Chief DeMaio made a good faith mistake and not a "deliberate error" -- will be to discourage immigrants from seeking police assistance, encouraging self-help, leading to more bodies being found on city streets. Nice going, Anne. Cities like Newark will become the "wild, wild west."
Whether Ms. Milgram's hostility to Latino males is due to her "militant lesbianism" (whatever that is, it sounds like fun!) cannot be determined at this time. Another effect will be to further alienate residents from the police in New Jersey. This development takes place in a state where cops have already been demonized by allegations of endemic racism, corruption, stupidity and politicking, making public cooperation with the authorities by residents far less likely. This is bound to be helpful to law enforcement efforts in the Garden State. Sure it is. So is the obvious commission of crimes by N.J. public officials against me on a daily basis. Setting an example, Anne?
N.J. State Police officers being charged with RAPE and/or assaults or cybercrimes is likely to be unhelpful in the effort to build good community relations. The word on the streets is that you can't trust N.J. cops because a lot of them are involved in organized crime (which seems to be true, especially among members of the KKK or mafia on the various forces).
Anyone heard of something called "Chivalry Film Productions"? Code name? Also, street wisdom says that it is never a good idea to trust New Jersey lawyers, prosecutors and judges -- which is probably even more true, especially in Hudson and Camden Counties. When you talk to prosecutors and cops in those counties are you also talking to the mob? Probably.
At a time when intelligence on the streets is vital to prevent further terrorist or criminal incidents, this alienating of crucial populations is a new low when it comes imbecility in high places in Trenton. Your tax dollars are well spent on public officials like Anne Milgram or Chief "Justice" Stuart Rabner of New Jersey. (Irony very much intended.) Calling attention to this problem cannot be deflected by suggesting that it adds to alienation from police. In fact, such criticism is a reflection of dissidents' existing and understandable alienation from corrupt and criminal authorities as well as the besmirched legal institutions of New Jersey.
Nothing that I am writing in these blog entries comes as news to residents of New Jersey. Absolute cynicism about government and law is poisonous in a democracy -- cynicism is also justified, proper, and unavoidable in the most corrupt jurisdiction in the United States. The recent changes in motor vehicle titles will not address the problem of corruption. Bribed clerks will supply the new titles (for a not-so-small fee) to criminals exactly as they would have provided the old ones.
Most "prominent" N.J. criminals have their own "connections" in state government to acquire things like drivers' licenses and other documents. In a state where government agencies entrusted with enforcing ethics rules engage in unethical and criminal actions, only to have those crimes covered up with the knowledge of courts, the very idea of a legal system is a joke. (See "Deborah T. Poritz and Conduct Unbecoming to the Judiciary in New Jersey.")
What do you think will be the attitude to New Jersey on the part of the public and federal government if a second major terrorist attack is launched against a global symbol of American freedom from New Jersey, say, the Statue of Liberty? Given the history of corruption and criminality in N.J. politics, do you think that the response will be "muted"? I don't.
I think terrorists and some of the organizations devoting millions of dollars and many hours to planning attacks on America are likely to fix on launching something from New Jersey, which is a world-level joke and horror story. People who hate America, aiming to hurt and kill Americans are evil, but not stupid. Terrorists can count on communities providing support and cover in New Jersey. Terrorists also would be close to highly desirable targets by establishing a base in northern New Jersey.
"I have reason to believe" that there already is such a base in northern New Jersey, given the history of extremism that led to the first successful bombing attempt on the World Trade Center. Public officials can be bribed in Trenton and Union City with impunity. Much that would need to be accomplished can be done easily (also relatively cheaply, in terms of "corruption expenditures," as one former client -- who was probably a deceptively successful businessman, a Republican criminal -- expressed it, complaining that he could not "write off" these "costs" of bribing N.J. officials).
Wake up, boys and girls. New Jersey's levels of corruption, dishonesty and incompetence in government and courts are extremely dangerous. The eyes and ears of police in urban settings "ain't working" thanks to policies like this cretinous "immigration directive." Preventing me from posting images to accompany my profile at blogger is not much of a response to this charge (especially since it proves what I am saying), neither are ad hominem insults directed against me, or further threats or attempts to harm me or my family members, or inserting "errors" in my writings. Ethics? First Amendment? Law? Not in New Jersey.
Oh, boy! A new "error" was discovered in the foregoing paragraph. I have now corrected it. Let us see whether it turns up again soon, like Anne Milgram's haunting and uninserted errors in judgment and in relations with the immigrant community in New Jersey. Hooters anyone?
Anne Milgram will wind up on the New Jersey judicial bench at some point in her life, becoming yet another moron in judicial robes, destroying lives and the Constitution, out of ignorance and "good intentions." Judge Moses? Debbie Poritz? How about all the discovery withheld from me, illegally, Anne? Tuchin's and Riccioli's reports detailing their many crimes over a period of years? Any chance I can get that stuff to which I am entitled at some point in my life? I thought not. I'll keep asking for all of that material, publicly. I hope the cover-up is unravelling.
New Jersey -- Come see for yourself!
