Wednesday, October 3, 2007

Organized Crime Group in New Jersey State Police.

October 4, 2007 at 9:23 A.M. I am unable to access my MSN account to continue working on an essay dealing with the Jena 6 case. I will spend the rest of the day trying to reach my MSN account. Maybe there are more swastikas being posted in fields near police stations in New Jersey. Spacing may be affected in this essay. At 9:52 A.M., I am blocking:

http://view.atdmt.com/Jaction/ko/msn_MSNBC...

http://ad.doubleclick.net/adj/N3016.msnbc/B229...

Http://ad.doubleclick.net/adj/N3016.msnbc/B229...


Richard G. Jones, "New Jersey Agrees to Settle Trooper's Harassment Suit," in The New York Times, October 2, 2007, at p. B2.
Jeremy W. Peters, "In New Jersey, Corruption May Alter Politics. Or Not.," in The New York Times, October 3, 2007, at B1.


"NEWARK, Oct. 1 -- Officials with the New Jersey attorney general's office said on Monday that the state had agreed to a $400,000 settlement in a lawsuit filed by a former state trooper who said that he was beaten and harassed by members of a secret group of rogue officers within the State Police."

An organized crime group made up of State Police officers -- how do they feel about swastikas? -- terrorizes law enforcement officers in alliance with big time criminals or selected politicians in New Jersey, allegedly, doing the dirty work for the Trenton Syndicate, knowing that they will never be prosecuted or charged in the Garden State for their many crimes. (A new "error" was inserted in this paragraph since my last review of this essay.) Evidently, these cop-criminals have a cybersquad.

Now you know why federal supervision of police was needed (and is still vital) in New Jersey. No wonder good old Stuart Rabner (who can't be as dumb as he looks, since no one could be that stupid) is afraid to act on what is now an obvious pattern of gross criminality, professional incompetence and worse (Tuchin and Riccioli), as well as continuing conspiracies to violate civil rights and then cover-up the violations. Maybe the so-called "Lords of Discipline" have a squad of cybercriminals. (More "errors" have been inserted in this text since last night.)

"The former trooper, Justin Hopson, filed the lawsuit in 2003. In it, he described a series of beatings, threats and acts of vandalism that he said occurred after he refused to support an arrest by another trooper in 2002."

"Mr. Hopson said he was attacked by members of a loose-knit group within the State Police known as the Lords of Discipline. For years, minority and female troopers have complained that they have been harassed by members of the group."

Sexual harassment of female officers and women drivers is a routine perk claimed by these guys. How do you feel about that Anne Milgram?

"In 2005, the state attorney general's office issued a report that found seven troopers guilty of harassing their colleagues. The troopers received punishments ranging from reprimands to 45 day suspensions, but the attorney general's office said it found no evidence that the Lords of Discipline existed within the State Police."

Everybody in New Jersey government, including Stuart Rabner and Anne Milgram (unless they are even more incompetent than I thought) knows that the Lords of Discipline "family" exists and officials are scared shitless of being targeted by the "boys." (One more "error" has appeared in this essay since my last reading of it.) Soon federal prosecutors and judges will be designated for destruction, through illicit, behind-the-back character assassinations and economic warfare. The "rogue" troopers are viciously racist and homophobic. (See "New Jersey's KKK Police Shocker.")

"... Mr. Hopson, 33, filed suit after the March 2002 arrest of a woman for drunken driving, which he said was improper because the woman had not been behind the wheel. At the time of the arrest, Mr. Hopson had been on the job 11 days."

Fabricating criminal charges, filing false police reports, lying to investigators -- are all crimes and not one of the N.J. troopers responsible for these actions, allegedly, has been charged or even investigated for these offenses. I wonder who is providing political protection? Richard J. Cody, Speaker Roberts, Bob Menendez, or others? Probably, it's all of the above to some degree.

Ms. Milgram through her spokesperson, David Wald, is lying by denying the existence of this organization and knows she's lying. The OAE exists "under" the attorney general's office, so there is no danger that these lies will result in ethics charges or any other difficulties for those offering them to the public with a straight face. Ms. Milgram will probably end up as a judge, requiring people to swear to tell the truth in her courtroom. Milgram won't be disciplined or disbarred when these statements concerning the non-existence of the Lords of Discipline are shown to be blatant lies. And they will be. There are rumors of federal investigations soon to result in more N.J. indictments. The efforts to cover-up police criminality makes a public official a co-conspirator, legally liable for all crimes committed in furtherance of that conspiracy to "cover up" hate crimes by dirty cops. (Go ahead, take out a letter from that previous sentence.)

Efforts against (more inserted "errors" and corrections!) Mr. Hopson began with psychological torture: "When Mr. Hopson refused to endorse fellow troopers' versions of events surrounding the arrest" -- was the young woman who was arrested attractive? -- "a campaign to silence him began. First, there were threatening notes left around his station house in the Troop A region, which covers much of South Jersey."

I bet she was strip searched.

"Then, Mr. Hopson said, his car was vandalized. By the time he sued the state in December 2003, Mr. Hopson said that he had been the victim of a series of beatings at the hands of another trooper."

"Mr. Hopson's lawyer, William H. Buckman, said that the Lords of Discipline is part of an unseemly subculture within the State Police."

"The agency is operating under the auspices of a federal monitor because of findings that it had improperly targeted drivers for moving violations [and parking tickets?] because of their race."

New Jersey's Supreme Court and attorney general, Anne Milgram, as well as Governor Jon S. Corzine must bear ultimate responsibility for these crimes taking place for years suggesting continuing, humiliating indifference and complicity in criminality on the part of the state's legal institutions. The whole world is watching. Ethics? In New Jersey?

In response to this shameful episode of criminality among law enforcement officials and corruption in high places, New Jersey authorities say that voters may not care about corruption since they will assume (correctly, in New Jersey) that politics is always corrupt.

"This could be the year that corruption dominates the political debate and Republicans wrest seats from the Democrats, who have controlled both houses of the Legislature since 2004. But political experts say they do not see that happening, not in a state where Democrats dominate the Legislature and occupy the governor's office and both United States Senate seats. And not in a state where voters have grown callused about government corruption."

Take a look at your children -- if you live in New Jersey -- and ask yourself whether MORE government and judiciary by the mob is what you wish to see in their future.

No comments: